Archive for November 11, 2026

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Apple Closing Community Support Forum

Apple (Hacker News):

The Apple Support Community will permanently close on November 20, 2026. Starting today, the site will no longer accept new posts and is available in a read-only state.

It’s not totally clear, but I take this to mean that they’re deleting all the data on November 20.

Joe Rossignol:

Apple informed MacRumors that it decided to sunset the Apple Support Community after a careful evaluation of strategy and customer needs.

That’s clear as mud. Like most forums, there was a lot of useless and even wrong information, but there were also gems not posted anywhere else. It seemed like AI had the potential to make finding them easier. The forums were often more helpful than Apple’s own support people, who would claim to have never heard of an issue before even though there was a thread about it with hundreds of replies. They often gave me wrong information, too.

Alternatives to the Apple Support Community include the MacRumors Forums and Reddit, and customers can continue to contact Apple Support.

Wesley Hilliard:

The good news is, AppleInsider will continue to offer detailed articles on how to solve any problem, plus you can use our forums to ask for help from our staff and many knowledgeable forum members.

See also: TidBITS Talk and Mac Power Users Talk.

Marcus Mendes:

If you have ever had a question or ran into a problem with an Apple product, chances are you have come across the Apple Support Community, the company’s official discussion forums where users from around the world help each other troubleshoot issues and share tips.

The platform has a history dating back to at least 1998, when it was known as Apple Tech Exchange. Since then, it was renamed Apple Discussions before relaunching as Apple Support Communities in April 2011, with a redesigned interface, personalized profiles, and a reputation system that rewarded users for helping others.

Michael Grothaus:

It’s unknown how many users the forums had, but even today, the portal still boasts that the Apple Support Community was “the world’s largest community of Apple fans.”

The problem with Apple Support Communities, in the opinion of many Apple users, was that the answers found on the forums were often lackluster, incomplete, or sometimes just downright wrong.

Many queries also often went unanswered, or the only replies to a tech support query were along the lines of “I’m having the same problem.”

[…]

Asking ChatGPT, Gemini, or Apple’s new Siri AI how to resolve your Apple problem is often the quickest way to get a reliable answer now.

But weren’t those in part trained using the community forums?

David Price:

One obvious issue with the forums would be the same one encountered by every company operating such a site: The owner has responsibility for the content without having control over it. If news of a hardware problem breaks, forum users will discuss it in a way that carries consequences for Apple’s corporate strategy, potentially widening awareness before the company is ready to release a statement or even seeding misinformation, and disgruntled device owners are unlikely to follow Apple’s desired messaging lines when complaining about the latest thing that has gone wrong.

[…]

In other words, Apple probably didn’t like the idea of owners googling a problem with their device, seeing the forums in a prominent search ranking and with official Apple branding, and then being exposed to unofficial messaging. It’s a company which is notorious for wanting to control the narrative at all times, and forums are a terrible medium for that.

Eric Schwarz:

I’m guessing that Apple sees this as more of a liability than an asset—when something controversial pops up (such as iPhone Duo displays failing), it’s a bit odd to be hosting the venue that makes you look bad. On the other hand, losing a potential space that isn’t Reddit is a little disappointing, even if it didn’t always fulfill the promise when it was set up 28 years ago.

Jason Snell:

These message boards were an embarrassment for Apple. Not only were they very much out of step with what the web has come to be over the last couple of decades, but their presence under an apple.com domain meant that they ranked highly in search and were perceived by the general public as being official in some way.

But they weren’t, nor were they helpful. They were full of people asking questions and not getting useful answers, with many responses given by users who were more motivated to gain karma in the forum’s user-ranking system than to help. I can’t tell you how many times I visited these forums while trying to track down the answer to a peculiar quirk or bug, only to find the (legitimate!) question being shut down by an officious high-ranking know-it-all who didn’t actually understand what was being asked and couldn’t provide a useful answer.

Nick Heer:

I am surprised by how abrupt this is.

Jordan-117:

I feel bad for the people who dedicated significant time to helping others there. I just pulled up a random page and there are users with tens of thousands of answers and profiles professing their love of all things Apple. Suddenly going read-only with no warning and killing it shortly after just seems like such a cold and abrupt way to end what was clearly some people’s hobby and point of pride. I hope they at least do something to privately acknowledge the most helpful users beyond the boilerplate message.

David:

I cannot believe they’re going to nuke all that historic information. It’s not like keeping it online costs more than a rounding error on their balance sheet.

William Gallagher:

One reason for that could well be that, according to AppleInsider sources, Apple hasn’t even been reading those forums for at least the last five years.

Jeff Johnson:

That’s a problem. Apple should have been reading its own forums and also other online forums like Reddit.

Apple sits back like fucking dummies, ignoring problems that everyone knows exist because nobody bothers to fight through the red tape of supplying Apple with the required information including sysdiagnose and TPS reports via Feedback Assistant.

Previously:

Siri AI Open to “All” Developers

Apple (MacRumors):

Starting today with the iOS 27.3, iPadOS 27.3, macOS 27.3, and visionOS 27.3 betas, a new Developer Preview enables any developer to integrate their app with Siri AI, giving businesses and developers new ways to reach and serve their customers.

[…]

Today’s preview allows any app to bring its content and actions directly into Siri AI by using App Intents, making it easier for all apps to tap into Siri AI’s newest capabilities, including personal context understanding, onscreen awareness, natural language, and more. So people can just ask for help in their own words, and Siri AI carries out any custom action you’ve built, from checking a delivery to booking a reservation to placing an order. For complex requests, we’re also introducing skills to let you teach Siri AI how to combine several actions into a single experience. And Siri AI can now surface any entity in the Spotlight semantic index, not just the ones that fit an existing schema.

[…]

To learn more about the new APIs, how to use them, and how to evaluate your app’s experience with Siri AI, read new documentation.

Rui Carmo (René Fouquet):

As someone who, last time I checked, doesn’t have any glimmer of hope of using Siri AI on iOS in the EU, I found this announcement vaguely insulting and highly disingenuous, but that’s Apple for you when it comes to addressing developers these days…

Benjamin Mayo:

The app skills sound very similar to what other LLM-driven AI models offer, enabling richer understanding of complicated tasks.

[…]

It’s also going to be a lot easier to initiate Siri actions for third-party apps. With the Siri AI Developer Preview, users don’t have to explicitly mention the app’s name in many circumstances. For instance, if a Live Activity for a ride-sharing app is active, Siri will automatically understand that a request to “change the ride address” corresponds to the app driving the Live activity.

Steve Troughton-Smith:

So uh Apple basically just implemented exactly what I was looking for, in iOS/macOS 27.3. You add a skills bundle to your app, full of markdown files, providing guidance to Siri. And, clearly, any agent like Claude or Codex.

Federico Viticci (tweet):

The short version is that Siri AI is no longer a specialized, domain-specific assistant but can instead work with any type of app. The longer version is that this also means Apple had to fundamentally improve the Siri AI harness during the iOS 27 cycle to support these new capabilities. For example, the updated Siri AI harness (called “agentic planner” in iOS 27’s code) can now dynamically read skills supplied by apps at runtime when performing a complex action. That’s right: Apple is also fully supporting the Markdown Agent Skills spec now with the ability for developers to supply a variety of skills in their apps to give Siri more precise instructions for longer actions and complex requests.

[…]

And here are the new tools included in Siri AI’s agentic planner, as parsed from the iOS 27.3 beta firmware:

  • view_skill: This one loads an app’s instructions for a specific skill.
  • get_skill_response: Lets the system receive a skill’s result or follow-up question.
  • available_skills: Metadata listing the skills Siri can choose from, with their names and descriptions (but not the full body text).
  • activated_skill_instructions: Metadata containing the loaded skill’s instructions for the current turn.

Apple itself is already shipping three skills in the first beta of iOS 27.3, including one that teaches Siri how to select and edit text in the Notes app.

Jordan Morgan:

Apple tried to do two things. They wanted a Siri that understood what our apps could do, and a system broad enough to include apps of every shape and size. But that was never going to happen; we still had to squeeze our apps into boxes Apple picked.

[…]

But lo, with a random post on X, I saw that Apple is finally freeing us from domains. You can supply your arbitrary app intent definitions to the system, and even supply skill files in Markdown to help Siri know how, and when, to use them.

Greg Pierce:

This sounds amazing, and I didn’t think we’d see App Intents integration into Siri AI until next WWDC[…]

Anders Borum:

Like many developers, I’m extremely happy with the iOS 27.3 changes for Siri AI, where Apple did the obvious (if hard) thing and mapped tool calling to app intents.

Often one app intent works well as both a Shortcuts action and a tool, but sometimes you want one app intent for Shortcuts and another for Siri AI.

It would be great to have a way to expose an intent only to Siri AI.

Previously:

Siri AI Adds Languages

Apple:

With the 27.2 software updates released today, Siri AI — an entirely new version of Siri that is profoundly more capable, conversational, and personal — is expanding to more people around the world, with availability now in the French, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish languages.

[…]

Language support for Siri AI will continue to expand, with availability in Chinese (Traditional), Norwegian, Turkish, and Vietnamese coming by the end of the year.

[…]

Siri AI is currently unavailable in the EU in iOS, iPadOS, and watchOS. Apple is working constructively with the EU in an attempt to find a path forward.

Previously: