ChatGPT
We’ve trained a model called ChatGPT which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests.
[…]
We are excited to introduce ChatGPT to get users’ feedback and learn about its strengths and weaknesses. During the research preview, usage of ChatGPT is free. Try it now at chat.openai.com.
It happened to be Wednesday night when my daughter, in the midst of preparing for “The Trial of Napoleon” for her European history class, asked for help in her role as Thomas Hobbes, witness for the defense. I put the question to ChatGPT[…] This is a confident answer, complete with supporting evidence and a citation to Hobbes work, and it is completely wrong.
[…]
What has been fascinating to watch over the weekend is how those refinements have led to an explosion of interest in OpenAI’s capabilities and a burgeoning awareness of AI’s impending impact on society, despite the fact that the underlying model is the two-year old GPT-3. The critical factor is, I suspect, that ChatGPT is easy to use, and it’s free: it is one thing to read examples of AI output, like we saw when GPT-3 was first released; it’s another to generate those outputs yourself; indeed, there was a similar explosion of interest and awareness when Midjourney made AI-generated art easy and free[…]
[…]
There is one site already on the front-lines in dealing with the impact of ChatGPT: Stack Overflow. Stack Overflow is a site where developers can ask questions about their code or get help in dealing with various development issues; the answers are often code themselves. I suspect this makes Stack Overflow a goldmine for GPT’s models: there is a description of the problem, and adjacent to it code that addresses that problem. The issue, though, is that the correct code comes from experienced developers answering questions and having those questions upvoted by other developers; what happens if ChatGPT starts being used to answer questions?
josh (via Hacker News):
Google is done.
Compare the quality of these responses (ChatGPT)
Gaelan Steele (via Hacker News):
For fun, I had ChatGPT take the free response section of the 2022 AP Computer Science A exam. […] It scored 32/36.
Thus far, Jacob and I have hand-crafted (meaning written with just our own brains), the Apparent Software App Store descriptions. That said, I would definitely consider an AI-assisted approach to get started.
[…]
Some indie developers reporting good luck with this approach thus far include Noam Efergan, author of the upcoming Baby Wize app and Johan Forsell, author of BarTab[…]
Previously:
- Stable Diffusion With Core ML on Apple Silicon
- Introductory Programming Assessment Must Accommodate Copilot-like Assistants
- DALL-E
Update (2022-12-14): Dare Obasanjo:
Google employees explain why we haven’t seen ChatGPT like functionality in their products; the cost to serve an AI result is 10x to 100x as high as a regular web search today plus they’re too slow relative to how quick search results must be returned.
Curious: have you found ChatGPT useful in doing professional work?
If so, what kinds of prompts and answers have been helpful? Detailed examples greatly appreciated!
Apparently it can cite sources, but just makes them up!