Friday, Oct 25, 2002 [Tweets] [Favorites]

Tetris is Hard, Even to Approximate

Erik D. Demaine, Susan Hohenberger, and David Liben-Nowell wrote a paper on the computational complexity of Tetris.

In the popular computer game of Tetris, the player is given a sequence of tetromino pieces and must pack them into a rectangular gameboard initially occupied by a given configuration of filled squares; any completely filled row of the gameboard is cleared and all pieces above it drop by one row. We prove that in the offline version of Tetris, it is NP-complete to maximize the number of cleared rows, maximize the number of tetrises (quadruples of rows simultaneously filled and cleared), minimize the maximum height of an occupied square, or maximize the number of pieces placed before the game ends. We furthermore show the extreme inapproximability of the first and last of these objectives to within a factor of p^(1-epsilon), when given a sequence of p pieces, and the inapproximability of the third objective to within a factor of (2 - epsilon), for any epsilon>0. Our results hold under several variations on the rules of Tetris, including different models of rotation, limitations on player agility, and restricted piece sets.

I spent a fair amount of time in David’s office last summer and never once saw him playing! Some of the comments on Slashdot are pretty funny. Also see the grad-student emotion check-list.


Stay up-to-date by subscribing to the Comments RSS Feed for this post.

Leave a Comment