Thursday, October 24, 2002 [Tweets] [Favorites]

Lazy vs. Strict

A short paper by Philip Wadler (via Lambda).

Lazy, or call-by-need, languages schedule work dynamically by building closures, and shun side effects; strict, or call-by-value languages avoid the overhead of closures and may exploit side effects. Each style has complementary advantages and complimentary adherents.

The gap between the lazy and strict camps has two dimensions, which we shall name style and models. Recent developments suggest that along both dimensions the gap is shrinking. We list some commercial applications of each kind of language, and examine each dimension of difference in turn.


Stay up-to-date by subscribing to the Comments RSS Feed for this post.

Leave a Comment