Saturday, October 19, 2002 [Tweets] [Favorites]

Mach-O vs. CFM

Slava Karpenko writes about the problems of Mac OS X using the Mach-O ABI, estimating that it causes a 10% performance hit because Mach-O was designed for a CISC architecture. I haven’t studied this enough to know whether he’s right, but I’ve not heard any arguments that Mach-O is technically better.

Comments

Stay up-to-date by subscribing to the Comments RSS Feed for this post.

Leave a Comment