January 10th, 2017

@geoffhackworth Yeah, hard to believe it ran for 19.5 hours with the backlight on.

4:16 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@geoffhackworth What does it mean if they do the exact same tests with the bug fix from Apple and get consistent results?

4:12 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@geoffhackworth It’s also a well-known issue in science to change the number of results collected after you start seeing the data.

4:08 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@geoffhackworth Except they reported the range of results, not just the 10.

4:07 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@geoffhackworth Would also damage their credibility if they got surprising results and didn’t publish them. Hope there’s a good explanation.

3:56 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@geoffhackworth I wonder what the timeline was. They did say that they found the results odd and reported them to Apple before publishing.

3:40 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@OluseyiSonaiya If they fit you, they really stay in amazingly well. But I hope they make more sizes or license or something.

3:23 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to OluseyiSonaiya

@geoffhackworth I guess, but why do that when there’s a setting?

3:22 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to geoffhackworth

@owensd Takes me here: https://t.co/IIBv7KvD81

3:22 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac

@owensd Works for me.

3:21 PM, Jan 10th, 2017 via Tweetbot for Mac in reply to owensd