{"id":8756,"date":"2014-04-27T15:16:14","date_gmt":"2014-04-27T19:16:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/?p=8756"},"modified":"2015-03-10T19:23:58","modified_gmt":"2015-03-10T23:23:58","slug":"omnifocus-2s-low-information-density","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2014\/04\/27\/omnifocus-2s-low-information-density\/","title":{"rendered":"OmniFocus 2&rsquo;s Low Information Density"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.omnigroup.com\/omnifocus\">OmniFocus<\/a> 2 for Mac adds some <a href=\"http:\/\/support.omnigroup.com\/changes-in-omnifocus-2\">cool features<\/a>. The inspector sidebar and Quick Open seem especially nice. But it also includes a new layout that I think is a regression. I&rsquo;ve been worried since last winter that OmniFocus 2 would ship with an iPad-style two-line design. It seems cluttered with <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/reduce-visual-chatter-by-moving-the-note-icon\/913\">icons<\/a> and<a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/25\"> context names<\/a> that get in the way when I&rsquo;m scanning, while showing <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/30\">much<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/27\">less<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/57\">actual<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/103\">information<\/a> in the same amount of space. (<a href=\"http:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2014\/01\/18\/omnioutliner-4\/\">OmniOutliner 4<\/a> also reduced its data density, but it included options in the Pro version to tighten up the spacing.) The current OmniFocus beta, which is quite a shock to an OmniFocus 1 user, is actually the <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/61\">new and improved design<\/a>:<\/p>\r\n<blockquote cite=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/61\"><p>In today&rsquo;s most recent build (r207056), we&rsquo;ve significantly reduced the amount of vertical whitespace in the main outline for actions and projects. OmniFocus 2 can now displays 65 rows in the same amount of space as it would previously use to display 48 rows&mdash;an increase of over 35%.<\/p><\/blockquote>\r\n<p>Ken Case says that Omni is <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/39\">listening<\/a>, but the layout&rsquo;s been this way since the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.omnigroup.com\/blog\/debut-of-omnifocus-2\">first public screenshots<\/a>&mdash;and presumably long before that internally. This is obviously not a high priority. The user interface is now <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/we-have-reached-ui-freeze\/1316\">frozen<\/a> for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.omnigroup.com\/blog\/omnifocus-2-for-mac-resumes-testing-will-ship-in-june\">June release<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>The new design also has the <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-do-we-feel-about-the-checkboxes-on-the-right\/401\">checkboxes on the right<\/a>, like in iOS, but I don&rsquo;t think this works as well with a <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/how-can-the-data-density-be-improved\/86\/62\">wider window<\/a>. The left sidebar with the project and context has a minimum width that&rsquo;s about twice what it should be, wasting further space. They&rsquo;ve also removed the features for <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/requests-to-add-custom-fonts-colors-styling-in-the-outline-view\/597\">customizing the fonts and styles<\/a> and reduced the filtering and sorting options.<\/p>\r\n<p>I consider OmniFocus 1.x to be one the best Mac apps ever, so it pains me to see it seemingly ruined by iOSification. It looks nice, but I don&rsquo;t think it <a href=\"https:\/\/mokriya.quora.com\/Designer-Duds-Losing-Our-Seat-at-the-Table\">works<\/a> well. Obviously, the developers are no dummies. Maybe they are right and this is what most people want.<\/p>\r\n<p>Nevertheless, it puts fans of the old version in a bad position. Soon 1.x will no longer be supported. Someday it will stop syncing with the current iPhone version, or break in some other way. There&rsquo;s no telling when or even if 2.x will match it. There are lots of <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/move-to-a-different-solution-if-interface-concerns-arent-addressed\/1248\">competing apps<\/a>, but I haven&rsquo;t found any of them compelling.<\/p>\r\n<p>Update (2014-05-20): <a href=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/alternate-layout-which-displays-everything-on-one-line-with-status-circles-on-the-left\/1697\">Ken Case<\/a> announces a work in progress:<\/p>\r\n<blockquote cite=\"http:\/\/discourse.omnigroup.com\/t\/alternate-layout-which-displays-everything-on-one-line-with-status-circles-on-the-left\/1697\"><p>If you&rsquo;d prefer to see all of your task information laid out in one line (so it&rsquo;s more vertically compact) and would prefer your status circles on the left, you can start experimenting with this now by opening this URL[&#8230;]<\/p><\/blockquote>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OmniFocus 2 for Mac adds some cool features. The inspector sidebar and Quick Open seem especially nice. But it also includes a new layout that I think is a regression. I&rsquo;ve been worried since last winter that OmniFocus 2 would ship with an iPad-style two-line design. It seems cluttered with icons and context names that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"apple_news_api_created_at":"","apple_news_api_id":"","apple_news_api_modified_at":"","apple_news_api_revision":"","apple_news_api_share_url":"","apple_news_coverimage":0,"apple_news_coverimage_caption":"","apple_news_is_hidden":false,"apple_news_is_paid":false,"apple_news_is_preview":false,"apple_news_is_sponsored":false,"apple_news_maturity_rating":"","apple_news_metadata":"\"\"","apple_news_pullquote":"","apple_news_pullquote_position":"","apple_news_slug":"","apple_news_sections":"\"\"","apple_news_suppress_video_url":false,"apple_news_use_image_component":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[77,30,32,526,72],"class_list":["post-8756","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology","tag-design","tag-mac","tag-macapp","tag-omnifocus","tag-omnigroup"],"apple_news_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8756","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8756"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8756\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10762,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8756\/revisions\/10762"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8756"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8756"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8756"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}