{"id":51518,"date":"2026-04-08T14:26:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T18:26:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/?p=51518"},"modified":"2026-04-08T14:26:42","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T18:26:42","slug":"apple-granted-stay-over-external-purchase-fee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2026\/04\/08\/apple-granted-stay-over-external-purchase-fee\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple Granted Stay Over External Purchase Fee"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sarah Perez<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Apple is preparing to take its App Store fight with Epic Games back to the Supreme Court. In a new filing,<\/a> the iPhone maker said it plans to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review another aspect of this long-running case over App Store fees.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, Apple sought to pause the appeals court’s ruling limiting how it can charge for external payments. On Monday, April 6, the court granted<\/a> Apple’s motion, and Epic Games immediately challenged<\/a> it.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

Juli Clover<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Apple says that it does not want to make multiple major changes to its App Store fee structure. Instead, Apple proposes that the current no-commission setup remain in place until Apple hears back from the Supreme Court. Developers can currently include links to non-App Store purchase options in their apps and Apple charges no fee from purchases made using those links. Apple wants to continue fee-free links and hold off on the long legal battle to determine a fee for the time being.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

Marcus Mendes<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Additionally, Epic filed its actual response<\/a> opposing Apple’s original motion to stay the order. In it, the company reaffirms its stance that “Apple’s effort to stay this Court’s mandate is about nothing other than delay,” and argues that “staying the mandate (…) simply delays relief for consumers and allows Apple to continue reaping supracompetitive profits from IAP.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

Previously:<\/p>\n