{"id":42725,"date":"2024-04-02T16:07:19","date_gmt":"2024-04-02T20:07:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/?p=42725"},"modified":"2024-04-02T16:07:39","modified_gmt":"2024-04-02T20:07:39","slug":"oregon-passes-right-to-repair-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2024\/04\/02\/oregon-passes-right-to-repair-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Oregon Passes Right-to-Repair Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karl Bode<\/a> (Hacker News<\/a>, MacRumors<\/a>):<\/p>\n

Oregon has officially become the seventh state (behind New York, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Maine, and Minnesota) to pass “right to repair” legislation<\/a>, making it easier and more affordable for consumers to independently repair their own electronics. <\/p>

[…]<\/p>

But it also takes aim at “parts pairing<\/a>,” or the practice of preventing you from replacing device parts without the approval of a company or its restrictive software. Apple, which routinely uses this practice to try and monopolize repair<\/a>, lobbied extensively against the Oregon bill<\/a>. As usual, under the (false) claim that eliminating parts pairing would put public safety and security at risk[…]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Nick Heer<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Quick note: the bill<\/a> (PDF) specifically exempts restrictions on parts pairing related to battery safety in paragraph 3(f). Of course, Apple has made the same dire warnings for years<\/a> in protest of right-to-repair legislation, and it is hard to know how seriously to take these claims. Oregon’s law does impose some new rules about the ways parts pairing can be used which appear to address some gaps in Apple’s repair policies<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n

Previously:<\/p>\n