{"id":37231,"date":"2022-10-06T14:31:12","date_gmt":"2022-10-06T18:31:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/?p=37231"},"modified":"2022-10-06T14:31:12","modified_gmt":"2022-10-06T18:31:12","slug":"cydia-appeals-apple-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2022\/10\/06\/cydia-appeals-apple-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Cydia Appeals Apple Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Joe Rossignol<\/a> (tweet<\/a>):<\/p>\n

Cydia parent company SaurikIT, LLC has filed an appeal<\/a> with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit after U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dismissed the company’s antitrust lawsuit against Apple last month, according to court documents.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Jay Freeman<\/a> (via Kosta Eleftheriou<\/a>):<\/p>\n

We filed a lawsuit. Apple filed to dismiss it, and we had a hearing over it. At that hearing the judge seemed to agree the case should continue but that we needed to clarify our filings. We were thereby “dismissed with leave to amend”, specially so we could go amend the documents, on a timeline decided during that hearing. Of course, it was reported as “oh no! saurik’s case was dismissed, and maybe he’ll bother to amend”.<\/p>

[…]<\/p>

Then the case was allowed to continue, but… was “dismissed in part”, which means there was one part of the lawsuit which the court decided to dismiss. This happened to be a claim we liked, and where we would like to get a second opinion sooner; it was also claim that Apple wants to feel really sure about, so we all agreed to a “stipulation to dismiss”, where, with permission from the other side, we ASKED the judge to dismiss our own case (in what might be a risky gambit) SO we could immediately go into appeal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Previously:<\/p>\n