{"id":28302,"date":"2020-03-05T15:24:38","date_gmt":"2020-03-05T20:24:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/?p=28302"},"modified":"2020-03-05T15:24:38","modified_gmt":"2020-03-05T20:24:38","slug":"hiding-easter-eggs-in-maps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2020\/03\/05\/hiding-easter-eggs-in-maps\/","title":{"rendered":"Hiding Easter Eggs in Maps"},"content":{"rendered":"

Zoey Poll<\/a> (via Paul Kafasis<\/a>, Hacker News<\/a>):<\/p>\n

Watching a single place evolve over time reveals small histories and granular inconsistencies. Train stations and airports are built, a gunpowder factory disappears for the length of the Cold War. But on certain maps, in Switzerland’s more remote regions, there is also, curiously, a spider, a man’s face, a naked woman, a hiker, a fish, and a marmot. These barely-perceptible apparitions aren’t mistakes, but rather illustrations hidden by the official cartographers at Swisstopo in defiance of their mandate “to reconstitute reality.” Maps published by Swisstopo undergo a rigorous proofreading process, so to find an illicit drawing means that the cartographer has outsmarted his colleagues.<\/p>

[…]<\/p>

Errors—both accidental and deliberate—are not uncommon in maps (17th-century California as an island<\/a>, the omission of Seattle<\/a> in a 1960s AAA map). Military censors have long transformed nuclear bunkers into nondescript warehouses and routinely pixelate satellite images of sensitive sites. Many maps also contain intentional errors to trap would-be copyright violators. The work of recording reality is particularly vulnerable to plagiarism: if a cartographer is suspected of copying another’s work, he can simply claim to be duplicating the real world— ideally, the two should be the same. Mapmakers often rely on fictitious streets, typically no longer than a block, to differentiate their accounts of the truth (Oxygen Street in Edinburgh, for example).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Previously:<\/p>\n