{"id":13807,"date":"2016-03-08T13:19:28","date_gmt":"2016-03-08T18:19:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/?p=13807"},"modified":"2021-06-18T07:08:04","modified_gmt":"2021-06-18T11:08:04","slug":"apple-to-pay-450-million-e-book-settlement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/2016\/03\/08\/apple-to-pay-450-million-e-book-settlement\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple to Pay $450 Million E-Book Settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/politics\/articles\/2016-03-07\/apple-rejected-by-u-s-high-court-in-450-million-e-book-case\">Greg Stohr<\/a> (<a href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/tech-policy\/2016\/03\/apple-must-pay-450-million-as-supreme-court-rejects-e-book-antitrust-appeal\/\">Ars Technica<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/news.ycombinator.com\/item?id=11240961\">Hacker News<\/a>):<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/politics\/articles\/2016-03-07\/apple-rejected-by-u-s-high-court-in-450-million-e-book-case\"><p>Apple Inc. must pay $450 million to end an antitrust suit after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to question a finding that the company orchestrated a scheme to raise the prices for electronic books.<\/p>\n<p>The justices, without comment, turned away an appeal by Apple, leaving intact a federal appeals court ruling favoring the U.S. Justice Department and more than 30 states that sued.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Following Apple&rsquo;s entry, output increased, overall prices decreased, and a major new retailer began to compete in a market formerly dominated by a single firm,&rdquo; the company said in its appeal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.macrumors.com\/2016\/03\/07\/apple-to-pay-450-million-e-book-settlement\/\">Mitchel Broussard<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"http:\/\/www.macrumors.com\/2016\/03\/07\/apple-to-pay-450-million-e-book-settlement\/\">\n<p>Specifically, the amount will be broken down to have $400 million paid out to e-book customers, $20 million to the states, and $30 million in the form of legal fees. The case saw Apple fighting an accusation that in 2010 it colluded with five publishers -- HarperCollins, Simon and Schuster, Hachette Book Group, Macmillan, and Penguin -- to fix the prices of e-books in order to become a dominant presence in a market overshadowed by companies like Amazon.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sixcolors.com\/link\/2016\/03\/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-apple-ebook-case\/\">Jason Snell<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"https:\/\/sixcolors.com\/link\/2016\/03\/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-apple-ebook-case\/\"><p> I believe, based on my layman&rsquo;s understanding of the case, that Apple and the publishers really did violate the law. The oddity is that the collusion seems to have been an attempt to create <em>more<\/em> competition in a market previously dominated by Amazon.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/daringfireball.net\/linked\/2016\/03\/07\/apple-ebook-shaft\">John Gruber<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"http:\/\/daringfireball.net\/linked\/2016\/03\/07\/apple-ebook-shaft\"><p>I think they got the shaft.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/news.ycombinator.com\/item?id=11240961\">dilemma<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"https:\/\/news.ycombinator.com\/item?id=11240961\"><p>Amazon uses MFN to be able to match the lowest price available. Apple uses MFN to fix prices so that nobody sells the same titles for less than they do.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>MFN in combination with the five-publisher collusion orchestrated by Apple let them negotiate to increase prices.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/news.ycombinator.com\/item?id=11242814\">Pyxl101<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"https:\/\/news.ycombinator.com\/item?id=11242814\"><p>If you look at emails and communication from people involved, it seems pretty clear to me that Apple knowingly and actively participated in a conspiracy to fix prices. They really took the leading role in organizing the publishers and proposing the illegal-price fixing model. I will give you an overwhelming amount of evidence just in one comment, and a link to explore further details.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>This isn&rsquo;t about Apple giving the same deal to all publishers. This was about Apple convincing all publishers to give all <em>other<\/em> retailers the same deal as Apple -- <em>and all at the same time, as a single group across essentially the entire industry,<\/em> thus resulting in price fixing and price increases.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p>Update (2016-03-08): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcelhearn.com\/why-there-will-soon-be-a-huge-rise-in-ebook-sales\/\">Kirk McElhearn<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote cite=\"http:\/\/www.mcelhearn.com\/why-there-will-soon-be-a-huge-rise-in-ebook-sales\/\"><p>But even if there&rsquo;s $400 million that will be spent on ebooks &#8211; and, while many people may never spend what they get, others will spend more than what they get, because their share won&rsquo;t be enough to buy a book &#8211; this amount will inject a huge sum of money into the publishing industry.<\/p><\/blockquote>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Greg Stohr (Ars Technica, Hacker News): Apple Inc. must pay $450 million to end an antitrust suit after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to question a finding that the company orchestrated a scheme to raise the prices for electronic books. The justices, without comment, turned away an appeal by Apple, leaving intact a federal appeals [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"apple_news_api_created_at":"2021-06-18T11:08:07Z","apple_news_api_id":"4bbbca32-5829-4436-9d69-37ac8410ea14","apple_news_api_modified_at":"2021-06-18T11:08:08Z","apple_news_api_revision":"AAAAAAAAAAD\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/w==","apple_news_api_share_url":"https:\/\/apple.news\/AS7vKMlgpRDadaTeshBDqFA","apple_news_coverimage":0,"apple_news_coverimage_caption":"","apple_news_is_hidden":false,"apple_news_is_paid":false,"apple_news_is_preview":false,"apple_news_is_sponsored":false,"apple_news_maturity_rating":"","apple_news_metadata":"\"\"","apple_news_pullquote":"","apple_news_pullquote_position":"","apple_news_slug":"","apple_news_sections":"\"\"","apple_news_suppress_video_url":false,"apple_news_use_image_component":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[19,2085,38,166,93,41,209],"class_list":["post-13807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology","tag-amazon","tag-antitrust","tag-apple","tag-ebooks","tag-ibooks","tag-lawsuit","tag-legal"],"apple_news_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13807"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13807\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13809,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13807\/revisions\/13809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mjtsai.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}