<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SuperDuper 2.7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2012/07/29/superduper-2-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2012/07/29/superduper-2-7/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tsai</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2012/07/29/superduper-2-7/comment-page-1/#comment-672719</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-672719</guid>
		<description>@Matt SuperDuper has been very reliable for me, but I do agree that one should use multiple backup programs to guard against the possibility of a bug. The auto-pruned archive sounds nice. For many years, I used Qdea’s Synchronize Pro, which had a feature like that. Now I use Arq for that. Time Machine was broken for me on Lion—it could never create more than a few backups before corrupting itself—but I’m wondering whether I should give it another try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt SuperDuper has been very reliable for me, but I do agree that one should use multiple backup programs to guard against the possibility of a bug. The auto-pruned archive sounds nice. For many years, I used Qdea’s Synchronize Pro, which had a feature like that. Now I use Arq for that. Time Machine was broken for me on Lion—it could never create more than a few backups before corrupting itself—but I’m wondering whether I should give it another try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Henderson</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2012/07/29/superduper-2-7/comment-page-1/#comment-672639</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-672639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used SuperDuper for years, but have recently added Carbon Copy Cloner to the mix. I maintain a bootable backup at home and at the office, and have started using CCC at the office. I figure if there&#039;s ever an issue with one or the other, *both* my bootable backups won&#039;t be affected. (Maybe that&#039;s just the excuse that makes me feel better about using both. :-) One interesting feature of CCC is the ability to maintain an archive of deleted/changed files on the target drive. It&#039;ll automatically prune that archive to maintain 15GB of free space on the drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've used SuperDuper for years, but have recently added Carbon Copy Cloner to the mix. I maintain a bootable backup at home and at the office, and have started using CCC at the office. I figure if there's ever an issue with one or the other, *both* my bootable backups won't be affected. (Maybe that's just the excuse that makes me feel better about using both. :-) One interesting feature of CCC is the ability to maintain an archive of deleted/changed files on the target drive. It'll automatically prune that archive to maintain 15GB of free space on the drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
