Thursday, June 30, 2011

Pushing iCloud

Guy English:

iCloud builds on a single, high capacity, short message distribution system. Apple has called it “Push Notifications” before but, really, there’s a lot more to it than that. The advantage Apple gains from this isn’t apparent if you’re looking at software checklists — I’d bet there’s an Android announcement in a week or so that claims all the features iOS 5 promises. The thing is this, and it’s an important thing — always bet on the technologies that scale. […] Apple is now betting that multiple applications maintaining their own connections to disparate servers will end up performing poorly on mobile devices. I believe they’re right.

4 Comments RSS · Twitter

If I only I had the option of hosting the iCloud "truth" on my OS X server box instead of Apple's farm, I'd think it was pretty damn cool technology. As it stands, my enthusiasm is curbed.

I'm not quite sure I understand English's point. Is he saying that Android doesn't have the exact same push notifications system that Apple has? As far as I understand it (I might be wrong, as I haven't used it), Google's C2DM does the exact same thing Apple's push notifications do (and has done so since Android 2.2). There already is one server (Google's), and one connection from the device to the server.

http://code.google.com/android/c2dm/

@LKM I haven’t been following Android very closely, so thanks for pointing that out.

Leave a Comment