Comments on: Path Finder Per-Folder View Settings http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/ Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:01:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147294 Michael Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:57:33 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147294 We'll have to see about viewing the Skim stuff within EagleFiler. Depending on their open source license and how the code is structured, it might be possible. Of course, it's pretty easy to just open the files in Skim, and then you can take advantage of its other features. Additional discussion and feature requests should go in the <a href="http://c-command.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7" rel="nofollow">EagleFiler forum</a>. We'll have to see about viewing the Skim stuff within EagleFiler. Depending on their open source license and how the code is structured, it might be possible. Of course, it's pretty easy to just open the files in Skim, and then you can take advantage of its other features. Additional discussion and feature requests should go in the EagleFiler forum.

]]> By: anon http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147279 anon Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:15:57 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147279 oh that makes a lot of sense. i guess this whole thread should have been in the c-command forums. oh well. by support for skim i mean viewing (and maybe creating) of the notes and markup from within EagleFiler. but just supporting pdfd would be 90% of lovely. i made that feature request and i was very pleased on it's implementation. oh that makes a lot of sense. i guess this whole thread should have been in the c-command forums. oh well. by support for skim i mean viewing (and maybe creating) of the notes and markup from within EagleFiler. but just supporting pdfd would be 90% of lovely. i made that feature request and i was very pleased on it's implementation.

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147271 Michael Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:57:46 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147271 The problem with doing it like iTunes is that EagleFiler can track a lot more information than iTunes, and to save memory it doesn't load everything at once. Putting it all in a single file would be slow, use lots of RAM, and result in a huge file. I'm not sure what you mean by "support for skim," but I am planning to support the new .pdfd bundle format. The problem with doing it like iTunes is that EagleFiler can track a lot more information than iTunes, and to save memory it doesn't load everything at once. Putting it all in a single file would be slow, use lots of RAM, and result in a huge file.

I'm not sure what you mean by "support for skim," but I am planning to support the new .pdfd bundle format.

]]> By: anon http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147268 anon Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:45:23 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-147268 i think i'd like them better if they were all in one place like the itunes library it seems like they change a lot and that my syncs got a little longer after a session in EagleFiler after they arrived, but maybe i am just imagining things. if they were invisible that would be a little nicer when browsing my files in Finder. OT: how about support for skim and their new bundles in EagleFiler? i think i'd like them better if they were all in one place like the itunes library it seems like they change a lot and that my syncs got a little longer after a session in EagleFiler after they arrived, but maybe i am just imagining things. if they were invisible that would be a little nicer when browsing my files in Finder.

OT: how about support for skim and their new bundles in EagleFiler?

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-146939 Michael Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:45:36 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-146939 That is what EagleFiler does. The plist files are a backup and for interoperability with other applications and scripts (kind of like the XML version of the iTunes library). What don't you like about the plists? Would you prefer it if they were invisible? That is what EagleFiler does. The plist files are a backup and for interoperability with other applications and scripts (kind of like the XML version of the iTunes library). What don't you like about the plists? Would you prefer it if they were invisible?

]]> By: anon http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-146858 anon Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:30:15 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/25/path-finder-per-folder-view-settings/#comment-146858 i would like it better if EF did something like this and plist files weren't being sprinkled about. i would like it better if EF did something like this and plist files weren't being sprinkled about.

]]>