Comments on: USB 3.0 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/19/usb-30/ Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:45:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Fred http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/19/usb-30/#comment-142473 Fred Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:17:28 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/19/usb-30/#comment-142473 The new USB won't actually be any faster than SATA, and may not even be faster than firewire in many real-world circumstances. Why? Way too much CPU overhead, and the middleman problem. The new USB won't actually be any faster than SATA, and may not even be faster than firewire in many real-world circumstances.

Why? Way too much CPU overhead, and the middleman problem.

]]> By: Qwerty Denzel http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/19/usb-30/#comment-142431 Qwerty Denzel Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:27:04 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/09/19/usb-30/#comment-142431 It sounds like USB 3.0 will continue to use the same irritating socket interface that previous versions have. (Though, of course, a plus for backwards compatibility) It sounds like USB 3.0 will continue to use the same irritating socket interface that previous versions have. (Though, of course, a plus for backwards compatibility)

]]>