<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IDEs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon H</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-96482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-96482</guid>
		<description>I liked how things worked back in the NeXT days, when ProjectBuilder was just for managing files. The debugger was gdb in a Terminal window, and the editor was Edit.app, or whatever else you wanted to use.

Much lighter weight.

Also, the documentation was in rtf files, not html, which I think I preferred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked how things worked back in the NeXT days, when ProjectBuilder was just for managing files. The debugger was gdb in a Terminal window, and the editor was Edit.app, or whatever else you wanted to use.</p>
<p>Much lighter weight.</p>
<p>Also, the documentation was in rtf files, not html, which I think I preferred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-93726</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-93726</guid>
		<description>LKM: To be clear, I was comparing it with the last Visual Studio that I used, about ten years ago. I haven't used Visual Studio .NET, but from the demos it looks pretty nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LKM: To be clear, I was comparing it with the last Visual Studio that I used, about ten years ago. I haven't used Visual Studio .NET, but from the demos it looks pretty nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LKM</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-93719</link>
		<dc:creator>LKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-93719</guid>
		<description>Of course it's better than older IDEs, but frankly, I wouldn't say that it's better than other modern IDEs like Visual Studio .NET or IntelliJ (both of which I kind of prefer to Xcode, although that may be because I spend more time in them). Xcode simply seems pretty messy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it's better than older IDEs, but frankly, I wouldn't say that it's better than other modern IDEs like Visual Studio .NET or IntelliJ (both of which I kind of prefer to Xcode, although that may be because I spend more time in them). Xcode simply seems pretty messy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-92418</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-92418</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I liked the early CodeWarriors, before they reset the version number and it started to get bloated and ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I liked the early CodeWarriors, before they reset the version number and it started to get bloated and ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-92414</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/06/08/ides/#comment-92414</guid>
		<description>The problem with Xcode is, indeed, the text editor. I tend to think early Metrowerks CodeWarrior 1.x was and remains the high point of Macintosh IDEs. (2.x brought in tons of bloat and an ugly UI change.)

I agree wholeheartedly with your last statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Xcode is, indeed, the text editor. I tend to think early Metrowerks CodeWarrior 1.x was and remains the high point of Macintosh IDEs. (2.x brought in tons of bloat and an ugly UI change.)</p>
<p>I agree wholeheartedly with your last statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
