<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking the Myth of Megapixels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/02/08/breaking-the-myth-of-megapixels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/02/08/breaking-the-myth-of-megapixels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/02/08/breaking-the-myth-of-megapixels/#comment-40768</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 05:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2007/02/08/breaking-the-myth-of-megapixels/#comment-40768</guid>
		<description>It's a poorly designed test all around, really. For his first test, he claimed to have printed his photos at 400 dpi... yet with different megapixel ratings, that would result in different sized prints. A 1 MP camera picture could look great at 400dpi... but it'd be very small. :-)

His "Zoom Lens" (most recent blog entry as of right now) is equally lame. But then again, I'm not his target market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a poorly designed test all around, really. For his first test, he claimed to have printed his photos at 400 dpi... yet with different megapixel ratings, that would result in different sized prints. A 1 MP camera picture could look great at 400dpi... but it'd be very small. :-)</p>
<p>His "Zoom Lens" (most recent blog entry as of right now) is equally lame. But then again, I'm not his target market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
