Comments on: Subversion Compilation Benchmarks http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/ Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:30:21 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-47166 Michael Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:06:26 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-47166 MacBook Pro (2.33 GHz, 3 GB) using gcc 4 after a restart: 1:44 MacBook Pro (2.33 GHz, 3 GB) using gcc 4 after a restart: 1:44

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-14157 Michael Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:11:02 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-14157 Here are <a href="http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/08/the-mac-pro-is-the-new-king-of-the-hill/" rel="nofollow">results from the Mac Pro</a>. Here are results from the Mac Pro.

]]> By: Mark http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-11501 Mark Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:49:20 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-11501 I thought it was weird when you mentioned how long Python took to startup after a few days of uptime because I'd never seen that. I compared compiles on my Dual 1.8 G5, 2GB RAM. mark@eagle:/usr/local/src/subversion-1.3.0$ uptime 22:15 up 13 days, 9:40, 2 users, load averages: 0.39 2.67 2.21 Downloaded subversion, opened Terminal and did the tar-configure-make dance: mark@eagle:/usr/local/src/subversion-1.3.0$ time make -j8 . . real 3m29.461s user 3m45.418s sys 2m31.063s That's with all my apps open, and my wife logged in via fast user switching. gcc 4.0.1. I immediately ran the make a second time and shaved 4 seconds off. The 4 second difference doesn't seem like much, but is a bit curious. On a Linux box I did the same test and got: real 1m16.499s user 1m53.587s sys 0m34.572s That was the second run. First run was about 0.6s slower. Not nearly as much of a difference between runs. The Linux box has been up for 122 days and is running several instances of Tomcat and Zope, so it's anything but "fresh". Coming to Mac from the UNIX world, I have to admit that I normally leave my G5 running all the time, only rebooting to apply security updates. I thought it was weird when you mentioned how long Python took to startup after a few days of uptime because I'd never seen that. I compared compiles on my Dual 1.8 G5, 2GB RAM.

mark@eagle:/usr/local/src/subversion-1.3.0$ uptime
22:15 up 13 days, 9:40, 2 users, load averages: 0.39 2.67 2.21

Downloaded subversion, opened Terminal and did the tar-configure-make dance:

mark@eagle:/usr/local/src/subversion-1.3.0$ time make -j8
.
.
real 3m29.461s
user 3m45.418s
sys 2m31.063s

That's with all my apps open, and my wife logged in via fast user switching. gcc 4.0.1.

I immediately ran the make a second time and shaved 4 seconds off.

The 4 second difference doesn't seem like much, but is a bit curious. On a Linux box I did the same test and got:

real 1m16.499s
user 1m53.587s
sys 0m34.572s

That was the second run. First run was about 0.6s slower. Not nearly as much of a difference between runs. The Linux box has been up for 122 days and is running several instances of Tomcat and Zope, so it's anything but "fresh".

Coming to Mac from the UNIX world, I have to admit that I normally leave my G5 running all the time, only rebooting to apply security updates.

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-11494 Michael Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:22:50 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-11494 PowerBook G4 (1.5 GHz, 1.25 GB) using gcc 4 after a restart: 8:54 PowerBook G4 (1.5 GHz, 1.25 GB) using gcc 4 after a restart: 8:54

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-11493 Michael Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:44:54 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-11493 The version of gcc also seems to matter. The above numbers are for gcc 3.3 on the G5 and gcc 4 on the iMac. When I changed to gcc 4 on the G5 and rebooted it took 3:05. The version of gcc also seems to matter. The above numbers are for gcc 3.3 on the G5 and gcc 4 on the iMac. When I changed to gcc 4 on the G5 and rebooted it took 3:05.

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-11492 Michael Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:25:44 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-11492 No. I didn't bother because I hadn't been using it very hard. (The G5 is still my main Mac.) But, for consistency, I just ran the compile after rebooting the iMac, and it took 1:56. No. I didn't bother because I hadn't been using it very hard. (The G5 is still my main Mac.) But, for consistency, I just ran the compile after rebooting the iMac, and it took 1:56.

]]> By: Luis de la Rosa http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-11491 Luis de la Rosa Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:19:04 +0000 http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/02/04/subversion-compilation-benchmarks/#comment-11491 Interesting. I didn't quite believe that daily reboots would help, but this is pretty good evidence. I'll ask that people give #s in the future by 1. quitting all apps, and 2. another set after rebooting. Incidentally, did you reboot your iMac Core Duo before running the compile that gave you 1:57? Interesting. I didn't quite believe that daily reboots would help, but this is pretty good evidence. I'll ask that people give #s in the future by 1. quitting all apps, and 2. another set after rebooting.

Incidentally, did you reboot your iMac Core Duo before running the compile that gave you 1:57?

]]>