<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing rsync on Tiger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blue80</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/#comment-131359</link>
		<dc:creator>blue80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/#comment-131359</guid>
		<description>After many hours and much fiddling trying to get backup happening. Rsync Lart 2.6.6 Darwinports version finally works for me on Tiger

http://rsync-lart.darwinports.com/

Well as good as it can....see Backup Bouncer for independent testing of capability:
http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2007/04/27/introducing-backup-bouncer/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After many hours and much fiddling trying to get backup happening. Rsync Lart 2.6.6 Darwinports version finally works for me on Tiger</p>
<p><a href="http://rsync-lart.darwinports.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rsync-lart.darwinports.com/</a></p>
<p>Well as good as it can....see Backup Bouncer for independent testing of capability:<br />
<a href="http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2007/04/27/introducing-backup-bouncer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2007/04/27/introducing-backup-bouncer/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/#comment-11436</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/#comment-11436</guid>
		<description>The .noindex trick doesn't seem very practical in my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .noindex trick doesn't seem very practical in my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurits</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/#comment-11435</link>
		<dc:creator>maurits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2006/01/16/fixing-rsync-on-tiger/#comment-11435</guid>
		<description>This is absolutely great news. I've been waiting for Apple to fix rsync since 10.4.1, but to no avail. Seems to have no particular priority for them, which is a shame.

I'd like to use rsync for backup purposes. But I'm still hesitant after this fix. After all, trust is important for any backup tool. When it comes to this patched-up version of rsync, I'm still not quite sure if I should trust it for backing up my valuable data. 

On a completely unrelated note, have you tried the ".noindex" trick described on Mac OS X hints instead of disabling Spotlight altogether? (I've disabled it, so I couldn't care less, but still curious...). To be honest, this spotlight-related bug also doesn't increase my trust level in rsync :-(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absolutely great news. I've been waiting for Apple to fix rsync since 10.4.1, but to no avail. Seems to have no particular priority for them, which is a shame.</p>
<p>I'd like to use rsync for backup purposes. But I'm still hesitant after this fix. After all, trust is important for any backup tool. When it comes to this patched-up version of rsync, I'm still not quite sure if I should trust it for backing up my valuable data. </p>
<p>On a completely unrelated note, have you tried the ".noindex" trick described on Mac OS X hints instead of disabling Spotlight altogether? (I've disabled it, so I couldn't care less, but still curious...). To be honest, this spotlight-related bug also doesn't increase my trust level in rsync :-(.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
