<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FastScripts 2.2.6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:30:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/comment-page-1/#comment-9477</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/#comment-9477</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael - it&#039;s a great treat to see my work handed &quot;kudos&quot; in a public arena like this. 

You are correct that FastScripts includes special code to better support Path Finder. I don&#039;t use Path Finder myself, but a customer who uses both it and FastScripts requested the functionality.  I simply make the assumption that if Path Finder is running, the user would rather open in that than in the (possibly also running) Finder.

Like most of the (sometimes surprising) refinements in FastScripts, I can only take credit for writing the code. The best ideas came from my users who, for reasons I cannot understand, choose not to use the utility exactly as I do :) 

Thanks again for the kind words,
Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael - it's a great treat to see my work handed "kudos" in a public arena like this. </p>
<p>You are correct that FastScripts includes special code to better support Path Finder. I don't use Path Finder myself, but a customer who uses both it and FastScripts requested the functionality.  I simply make the assumption that if Path Finder is running, the user would rather open in that than in the (possibly also running) Finder.</p>
<p>Like most of the (sometimes surprising) refinements in FastScripts, I can only take credit for writing the code. The best ideas came from my users who, for reasons I cannot understand, choose not to use the utility exactly as I do :) </p>
<p>Thanks again for the kind words,<br />
Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/comment-page-1/#comment-9443</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/#comment-9443</guid>
		<description>Path Finder doesn&#039;t register to handle URLs. At first I thought FastScripts might just be using the OS&#039;s generic &quot;open file&quot; feature. But Path Finder responds to that by opening a new window, whereas with FastScripts it reveals the folder in an existing window. So, although I didn&#039;t actually check, I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s using an Apple event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Path Finder doesn't register to handle URLs. At first I thought FastScripts might just be using the OS's generic "open file" feature. But Path Finder responds to that by opening a new window, whereas with FastScripts it reveals the folder in an existing window. So, although I didn't actually check, I'm pretty sure it's using an Apple event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/comment-page-1/#comment-9442</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/10/03/fastscripts-226/#comment-9442</guid>
		<description>Not that I&#039;m using PathFinder myself, but would have expected for this being nothing but a question about which application gets to handle file: URLs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I'm using PathFinder myself, but would have expected for this being nothing but a question about which application gets to handle file: URLs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
