<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language Usage Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/08/31/language-usage-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/08/31/language-usage-questions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zornek</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/08/31/language-usage-questions/#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zornek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/08/31/language-usage-questions/#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>I've use Google for this myself. It generally works great.

I've also had conversation where I wondered aloud why Google hasn't tried to license what's it has learned about spelling and grammar to other software companies, allowing them to improve their own spell checking and grammar checking algorithms. Maybe they have and it just hasn't public?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've use Google for this myself. It generally works great.</p>
<p>I've also had conversation where I wondered aloud why Google hasn't tried to license what's it has learned about spelling and grammar to other software companies, allowing them to improve their own spell checking and grammar checking algorithms. Maybe they have and it just hasn't public?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
