<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebKit Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/06/07/webkit-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/06/07/webkit-open-source/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/06/07/webkit-open-source/#comment-8208</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1049#comment-8208</guid>
		<description>Voodoo: It sounds like you're talking about WebCore. It was available before and has the LGPL-style license. But I didn't think WebKit source was available, and I see nothing GPL-like in its license file in CVS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voodoo: It sounds like you're talking about WebCore. It was available before and has the LGPL-style license. But I didn't think WebKit source was available, and I see nothing GPL-like in its license file in CVS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voodoo</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/06/07/webkit-open-source/#comment-8207</link>
		<dc:creator>Voodoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1049#comment-8207</guid>
		<description>It was always open source, the difference is that now it's "bazaar-style" open source, with development proceeding in public, and a well-defined procedure for the team to integrate patches from outsiders.

It seems to be at least partially LGPL (the non-"viral" version of the GPL).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was always open source, the difference is that now it's "bazaar-style" open source, with development proceeding in public, and a well-defined procedure for the team to integrate patches from outsiders.</p>
<p>It seems to be at least partially LGPL (the non-"viral" version of the GPL).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
