<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SpamSieve 2.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/04/25/spamsieve-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/04/25/spamsieve-23/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corpus reset &#171; Aldoblog</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2005/04/25/spamsieve-23/#comment-8331</link>
		<dc:creator>Corpus reset &#171; Aldoblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1010#comment-8331</guid>
		<description>[...] SpamSieve, by far the best anti-spam email tool I&#8217;ve used, was updated to version 2.3 yesterday. The biggest change listed was increased accuracy, due to improvements in the tokenizers and parsers. John Gruber reported that the beta versions were running at 99.9% accuracy for him, which is several tenths of a percent above where I&#8217;d peaked. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SpamSieve, by far the best anti-spam email tool I&#8217;ve used, was updated to version 2.3 yesterday. The biggest change listed was increased accuracy, due to improvements in the tokenizers and parsers. John Gruber reported that the beta versions were running at 99.9% accuracy for him, which is several tenths of a percent above where I&#8217;d peaked. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
