Comments on: cvs2svn http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/ Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:06:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Michael Tsai - Blog - Subversion to Git http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-110355 Michael Tsai - Blog - Subversion to Git Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:56:46 +0000 /?p=881#comment-110355 [...] whole trees, and easier tagging and branching (albeit by shoe-horning them into the tree). Switching was an easy decision. I remained happy with it, especially with the more reliable FSFS backend and [...] [...] whole trees, and easier tagging and branching (albeit by shoe-horning them into the tree). Switching was an easy decision. I remained happy with it, especially with the more reliable FSFS backend and [...]

]]> By: Michael Tsai - Blog - Switching From Trac to OmniOutliner Pro http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-11531 Michael Tsai - Blog - Switching From Trac to OmniOutliner Pro Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:34:47 +0000 /?p=881#comment-11531 [...] Naturally, when I switched from CVS to Subversion, I switched from CVSTrac to Trac. I like Trac even better than CVSTrac, except that it’s kind of a pain to install. When I got my iMac Core Duo I started thinking about building a universal binary version of Trac and realized that would be even more of a pain. [...] [...] Naturally, when I switched from CVS to Subversion, I switched from CVSTrac to Trac. I like Trac even better than CVSTrac, except that it’s kind of a pain to install. When I got my iMac Core Duo I started thinking about building a universal binary version of Trac and realized that would be even more of a pain. [...]

]]> By: Josh http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-8061 Josh Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:19:34 +0000 /?p=881#comment-8061 We use the FSFS option at my workplace, and it seems to be more robust across file systems as well as across multiple access methods. Coupled with the fact that it's lower maintenance, I don't see a downside to FSFS, and I wish it were the default. ---J We use the FSFS option at my workplace, and it seems to be more robust across file systems as well as across multiple access methods. Coupled with the fact that it's lower maintenance, I don't see a downside to FSFS, and I wish it were the default.

---J

]]> By: Michael http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-784 Michael Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:32:08 +0000 /?p=881#comment-784 Yes, I had to install bsddb3. It's used by the cvs2svn script itself, so it doesn't matter if you're using fsfs. Yes, I had to install bsddb3. It's used by the cvs2svn script itself, so it doesn't matter if you're using fsfs.

]]> By: Anonymous http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-783 Anonymous Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:26:18 +0000 /?p=881#comment-783 Building python from source solves the problem. Building python from source solves the problem.

]]> By: Anonymous http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-782 Anonymous Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:42:07 +0000 /?p=881#comment-782 Did you have to install a dbm module for python? I am getting an error when I try to use cvs2svn, but I want to use the fsfs back end of svn anyway. Did you have to install a dbm module for python? I am getting an error when I try to use cvs2svn, but I want to use the fsfs back end of svn anyway.

]]> By: rentzsch http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/08/30/cvs2svn/#comment-769 rentzsch Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:18:58 +0000 /?p=881#comment-769 Be sure to blog your install of Trac. I'm thinking of moving to it and I want to count the arrows in your back. :-) Be sure to blog your install of Trac. I'm thinking of moving to it and I want to count the arrows in your back. :-)

]]>