<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent Web Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/07/09/independent_web_publishin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/07/09/independent_web_publishin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:01:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Gruber</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/07/09/independent_web_publishin/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=557#comment-355</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point regarding my argument that impression-based ads lead to pandering over-hyped articles -- that can&#039;t the same argument be used for click-thru-based ads?



I have no evidence to back this up, but my suspicion is that it doesn&#039;t quite work the same way. I think most of the people who are clicking the ads at Daring Fireball, and whom I hope will continue to do so, are regular readers.



This week is an anamoly because I&#039;m getting a lot of traffic because of an article that is about the ads themselves. But in the long run, in normal weeks, I suspect that casual visitors to Daring Fireball are much less likely to click the ads than are regular readers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's a good point regarding my argument that impression-based ads lead to pandering over-hyped articles -- that can't the same argument be used for click-thru-based ads?</p>
<p>I have no evidence to back this up, but my suspicion is that it doesn't quite work the same way. I think most of the people who are clicking the ads at Daring Fireball, and whom I hope will continue to do so, are regular readers.</p>
<p>This week is an anamoly because I'm getting a lot of traffic because of an article that is about the ads themselves. But in the long run, in normal weeks, I suspect that casual visitors to Daring Fireball are much less likely to click the ads than are regular readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
