<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gender-neutral Singular Pronouns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/01/06/gender_neutral_singular_p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/01/06/gender_neutral_singular_p/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Gruber</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/01/06/gender_neutral_singular_p/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=159#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Singular &#8220;their&#8221; is not a new idea at all. My &lt;a href="http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html"&gt;favorite page on the subject&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singular &ldquo;their&rdquo; is not a new idea at all. My <a href="http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html">favorite page on the subject</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raena</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/01/06/gender_neutral_singular_p/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Raena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=159#comment-84</guid>
		<description>LambdaMOO had an interesting system of a nongendered gender, called Spivak. According to &lt;a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/michael/bashfaq.html"&gt;this FAQ:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;              Spivak        Feminine     Masculine

Subjective:   e             she          he

Objective:    em            her          him

Possessive:   eir           her          his



Other familiar pronouns can be extrapolated: 'emself', etc.&lt;/pre&gt;



So, not a new idea at all.  I've heard of nongendered new words being constructed as early as the 40's, but I can't track that down when it's 3am. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LambdaMOO had an interesting system of a nongendered gender, called Spivak. According to <a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/michael/bashfaq.html">this FAQ:</a></p>
<pre>              Spivak        Feminine     Masculine

Subjective:   e             she          he

Objective:    em            her          him

Possessive:   eir           her          his

Other familiar pronouns can be extrapolated: 'emself', etc.</pre>
<p>So, not a new idea at all.  I've heard of nongendered new words being constructed as early as the 40's, but I can't track that down when it's 3am. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mjtsai.com/blog/2003/01/06/gender_neutral_singular_p/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=159#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Yes, the idea is hundreds of years old. What I find interesting is that it keeps re-appearing. I didn&#8217;t realize you had a blog, Raena&#8212;will have to check it out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the idea is hundreds of years old. What I find interesting is that it keeps re-appearing. I didn&rsquo;t realize you had a blog, Raena&mdash;will have to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
